CVE-2020-8597
high-risk
Published 2020-02-03
eap.c in pppd in ppp 2.4.2 through 2.4.8 has an rhostname buffer overflow in the eap_request and eap_response functions.
Do I need to act?
!
65.4% chance of exploitation in next 30 days
EPSS score — higher than 35% of all CVEs
-
Not on CISA KEV list
No confirmed active exploitation reported to CISA
?
Patch status unknown
Check vendor advisories for fix availability and mitigation guidance
9
CVSS 9.8/10
Critical
NETWORK
/ LOW complexity
Affected Products (9)
Affected Vendors
References (44)
Third Party Advisory
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/156662/pppd-2.4.8-Buffer-Overflow.html
Third Party Advisory
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/156802/pppd-2.4.8-Buffer-Overflow.html
Mailing List
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2020/Mar/6
Third Party Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0630
Third Party Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0631
Third Party Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0633
Third Party Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0634
Third Party Advisory
https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-809841.pdf
Third Party Advisory
https://kb.netgear.com/000061806/Security-Advisory-for-Unauthenticated-Remote-Bu...
Third Party Advisory
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202003-19
Third Party Advisory
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200313-0004/
Third Party Advisory
https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsa-20-224-04
Third Party Advisory
https://usn.ubuntu.com/4288-1/
Third Party Advisory
https://usn.ubuntu.com/4288-2/
Third Party Advisory
https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4632
and 24 more references
66
/ 100
high-risk
Severity
32/34 · Critical
Exploitability
19/34 · Moderate
Exposure
15/34 · Moderate