CVE-2024-3661
high-risk
Published 2024-05-06
DHCP can add routes to a client’s routing table via the classless static route option (121). VPN-based security solutions that rely on routes to redirect traffic can be forced to leak traffic over the physical interface. An attacker on the same local network can read, disrupt, or possibly modify network traffic that was expected to be protected by the VPN.
Do I need to act?
~
2.9% chance of exploitation in next 30 days
EPSS score — moderate exploit probability
-
Not on CISA KEV list
No confirmed active exploitation reported to CISA
?
Patch status unknown
Check vendor advisories for fix availability and mitigation guidance
7
CVSS 7.6/10
High
ADJACENT_NETWORK
/ LOW complexity
Affected Products (20)
Anyconnect Vpn Client
Secure Client
Secure Access Client
Ipsec Mobile Vpn Client
Ipsec Mobile Vpn Client
Mobile Vpn With Ssl
Mobile Vpn With Ssl
Affected Vendors
References (40)
Third Party Advisory
https://bst.cisco.com/quickview/bug/CSCwk05814
Vendor Advisory
https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-24-170
Issue Tracking
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/263721377
Third Party Advisory
https://mullvad.net/en/blog/evaluating-the-impact-of-tunnelvision
Vendor Advisory
https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000139553
Issue Tracking
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40279632
Issue Tracking
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40284111
Vendor Advisory
https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2024-3661
Exploit
https://tunnelvisionbug.com/
Third Party Advisory
https://www.leviathansecurity.com/research/tunnelvision
and 20 more references
50
/ 100
high-risk
Severity
24/34 · High
Exploitability
6/34 · Minimal
Exposure
20/34 · Moderate