CVE-2016-1285
critical-risk
Published 2016-03-09
named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.8-P4 and 9.10.x before 9.10.3-P4 does not properly handle DNAME records when parsing fetch reply messages, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a malformed packet to the rndc (aka control channel) interface, related to alist.c and sexpr.c.
Do I need to act?
!
69.0% chance of exploitation in next 30 days
EPSS score — higher than 31% of all CVEs
-
Not on CISA KEV list
No confirmed active exploitation reported to CISA
?
Patch status unknown
Check vendor advisories for fix availability and mitigation guidance
6
CVSS 6.8/10
Medium
NETWORK
/ HIGH complexity
Affected Products (20)
References (58)
Issue Tracking
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=146191105921542&w=2
Third Party Advisory
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0562.html
Third Party Advisory
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0601.html
Third Party Advisory
http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3511
Third Party Advisory
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjan2016-2867206.html
Third Party Advisory
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinjan2016-2867209.h...
and 38 more references
73
/ 100
critical-risk
Severity
21/34 · High
Exploitability
19/34 · Moderate
Exposure
33/34 · Critical